Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr » | ||||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
Categories
- carbon fee (4)
- cardiac (1)
- clean energy (6)
- Climate change (12)
- CO2 (6)
- Denmark (1)
- drought (2)
- ecology (1)
- field trip (1)
- foresight (4)
- France (1)
- geothermal (3)
- global warming (6)
- insurance (2)
- junior science (1)
- medicine (2)
- nuclear power (4)
- solar (2)
- Switzerland (1)
- Texas (1)
- Uncategorized (7)
- wind power (2)
Latest Postings
- 20 September 2007: Get-rich-quick Memo to the Oil Barons
- 19 September 2007: The future ain’t what it used to be.
- 19 September 2007: Avoid the Optimal
- 16 September 2007: In Search of a Clean Gigawatt
- 15 September 2007: An Intelligence Test for Our Times
- 15 September 2007: Don’t Sleep Alone!
- 10 September 2007: Climate interview, part 1
- 8 August 2007: Climate interview, part 2
- 7 August 2007: Climate interview 3: Hot Rock Geothermal
- 4 August 2007: Climate interview 4: Nuclear Power
Links
Blogroll
The FT’s summary
Now if only the WSJ had the brains of UK’s Financial Times.
Climate change is one of the most serious issues facing the planet. Scientific evidence shows that temperature changes are likely to have profoundly negative consequences for human society, the global economy and the world’s natural systems. This poses risks and opportunities to which investors and companies must respond.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.